Subject	Rare does not imply subjective desire -->
Posted by	therinL on August 07, 2003 at 12:36 PM
	This message has been viewed 31 times.
In Reply To	keep the 'vert. posted by SactoTodd on August 07, 2003 at 12:29 PM
Message	Top down > t-tops?? Ick, I think not. =) If something is rare, it is uncommon or infrequently occuring. And slicktops definitely fit that bill. =) The level of desire that is seen from the consumer public is really irrelevant. It may change suppyl and demand, etc but will not change the rarity of the car.
Follow Ups	Slicktop and Convertible - z32ttvert 12:18:07 08/07/03 Theres any question?? Sell the vert! =) - therinL 12:25:01 08/07/03 Re: HEY! i resemble that remark! i have a vert as a second - swatsav 13:25:42 08/07/03 resemble? you mean resent that remark? (n/m) - JunomeanGF 15:24:38 08/07/03 no, i meant what i said. It's just an old saying. He made - swatsav 15:53:24 08/07/03 i see (n/m) - JunomeanGF 23:18:25 08/07/03 there's been a lot of this lately, hasn't there? (n/m) - yt nitram 18:27:00 08/07/03 re: Even though I've got my gripes .... - z32ttvert 18:19:34 08/07/03 re: Even though I've got my gripes .... - z32ttvert 19:03:13 08/07/03 keep the 'vert. - SactoTodd 12:29:24 08/07/03 hehe i did the opposite when looking for mine. - LordZ 12:35:37 08/07/03 Rare does not imply subjective desire --> - therinL 12:36:46 08/07/03 wanna buy a "rare" 323 GTX? - SactoTodd 12:40:25 08/07/03 Damn that IS rare...Have any leads? (n/m) - therinL 12:45:11 08/07/03 Lotus Esprit is more rare...Im saving up for one BTW =) (n/m) - therinL 12:47:40 08/07/03 I know a guy with an S4s :) (n/m) - LordZ 13:12:29 08/07/03 Awesome! I plan on buying a V8 SE(late 90s) in 2004 or 2005 (n/m) - therinL 13:24:52 08/07/03 His? You selling it Todd? (n/m) - BigTDogg 13:02:25 08/07/03 lol - SactoTodd 13:08:49 08/07/03 Right but...Rarity is NOT within the eye of the beholder... - therinL 13:32:07 08/07/03 How about a true Nissan Pulsar Sportbak (n/m) - bassplayr 13:53:35 08/07/03 actually, I always liked the look of those! (n/m) - z32ttvert 19:53:40 08/07/03 Grand National mmmmmmm (n/m) - BigTDogg 13:05:27 08/07/03 Re: GNX (mmmmmmmm)^2. (n/m) - SactoTodd 13:11:06 08/07/03 Top down > t-tops?? Ick, I think not. =) I don't agree. - z32ttvert 13:05:41 08/07/03 Sell both of them...I don't agree with anyone. (n/m) - Thomas(Houston) 12:33:46 08/07/03 slicktop then convert!!!!!!! (n/m) - Solidpantz (0 psi) :( 12:35:26 08/07/03 that's what I am thinking, yes. (n/m) - z32ttvert 13:07:00 08/07/03 Keep the convertible because you've already done the work - Rob'Z 13:11:02 08/07/03 hahahahha (n/m) - Solidpantz (0 psi) :( 13:26:39 08/07/03 dude, keep the vert, especially b/c you TT converted it, who - JunomeanGF 15:23:29 08/07/03 The Conv, TT is the ultimate, look and performance wise. (n/m) - PLEAZURE in CA (SD) 16:46:09 08/07/03 Re: Slicktop and Convertible - das boost 20:52:55 08/07/03 I wish I could keep (and TT convert) both ;-) (n/m) - z32ttvert 17:56:22 08/08/03 Convertible hands down. MUCH (emphasized) nicer car! - xxbulovax91xx 21:45:19 08/07/03 OMG!! T-tops off at 144 mph = permanent deafness ;-) (n/m) - z32ttvert 17:55:47 08/08/03
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.